Common Mistakes We Make in Dating

Common (the rapper who somehow became the voice for seemingly every commercial on TV) is reportedly dating Laura Dern. Now, I had no idea who Laura Dern is. I honestly had to Google her. But that’s not the point.

The point is the headline for the article I linked above:

‘She’s having fun and seeing where things go’: Laura Dern is ‘dating rapper Common and has already introduced him to her kids’

Now, I’ve always loved Common. After I uploaded all of my CDs to my computer (& sold them) and before my computer crashed and I lost all my music, I even had Can I Borrow a Dollar and every album Common has put out since then. When I had my college hiphop radio show, I was getting close to interviewing Common before I was expelled from the University of Delaware. I thought I was going to be an emcee and wrote a verse for a millennial sequel to his classic “I Used to Love H.E.R.” I called it: “I Used to Love H.E.R. TOO-thousand.” I thought I was “nyce.” Yet, I digress…

All that to say: I do hope their relationship is productive. I can’t say successful, because I don’t know if they’re meant to be together. And, neither do they. They don’t even know if they want to know if they’re meant to be together.

As crazy as that sounds, that’s the truth. The article quotes a source as saying, that Laura is “having fun and seeing where things go.” And that’s the problem.

When dating, we say we’re tired of “playing games.” Yet, in the typical dating game we “just have fun,” or we simply “see how things go.” But if we look at the sports world, no one does that!

And This is one of the Common Mistakes We Make in Dating

common super bowlSuper Bowl 50 is on the horizon. The Carolina Panthers will take on the Denver Broncos. Neither of those two teams started the season “just to have fun,” or to “see where things go.” None of the players went through the grueling preseason grind simply for kicks. If they had, they certainly would not be getting ready to play in the championship game, right?

They started with the end in mind. As they all say, “the goal is to win the Super Bowl.” From the beginning, they came together as a team in order to see if they could win a championship together.

For those teams that fell short, changes will be made. After realizing they don’t have what it takes in order to win a championship, they trade players, fire coaches, and get ready for the draft. The key thing is: they failed to win a championship. And except for the perennial bottom feeders (Cleveland Browns, and Oakland Raiders especially), winning a championship was the goal from the beginning.

You Shouldn’t Date for the Fun of It

Especially if you have children, the stakes are too high for you to date “for the fun of it.” And, so I would hope that Laura Dern wouldn’t simply be having fun. I would hope that Common, wouldn’t simply be seeing where things go when his lady’s children hang in the balance.

And beyond Common and Laura, I hope you don’t date simply to have fun and see where things go. I hope that you would play for a championship love. I hope that you would team up with the one with whom you can win a championship. And if you are with someone who you can’t win a championship with, I hope to see you gain the strength to break free from that relationship. I wrote a book to help you do this, which is on preorder now. But, you can download the report below this blog post to get started today.

You should be dating in order to find a championship love. You should be dating with purpose. Dating is hard…it’s tough. You know that without me telling you. So, why do that for fun? Why not date with purpose? Why not “play the game to win?” What do you think?

Being Locked Away: The Major Fear of a Man in Relationships

One day, out of no where, I got locked away. In Miami, with no family, I called the only person I could call: the woman I had been dating for a few weeks. That was a fearsome call.

You see, we had just met and she had quickly become special to me. After years of poor relationship choices, I felt I had finally turned the page. And I didn’t want to screw up, like I had done in other relationships.

But how do you call a woman you just met, to tell her you just got locked away?

I didn’t have a choice. My parents live in St. Thomas, Virgin Islands. They couldn’t help. I am an only child, so there was no sibling to call. I had lived in Miami for less than a year, so didn’t have many strong relationships. Even though we had only known each other a short time, she was the one I felt cared about me the most. It made sense to call her. But, I was afraid to call her.

Would calling her while locked away ruin my chances?

So much was going right. We had the beginnings of a beautiful relationship. I was about to sign a major contract for some group work with children. And, the program was being looked at by major players in Miami so the opportunities for expansion were great.

Maybe I could just disappear for a few, until I was arraigned. Then I could come up with some excuse for why I hadn’t called or returned her calls. Maybe her life would be so busy that she wouldn’t even notice I was MIA. If I call her, I might lose her…and that would make this situation far worse.

This is the major fear of a man in relationships

Maybe not that he would be locked away. But, that the woman he’s with would stop loving him if things turned for the worse in his life. As we struggle in this life, we have highs and lows. And, Society defines a man on the basis of those highs and lows. The highs are evidence of good character. The lows, bad character. And so, a man naturally fears being brought low by life and losing those he loves and needs.

And this is the sentiment expressed by Rock City on “Locked Away,” from their new album “What Dreams Are Made Of.” In this song, they ask the questions that plague a man. Adam Levine croons: “If I got locked away and we lost it all today, tell me honestly: would you still love me the same?”

Thanks be to God, I know that.

When I was released, she left her job during a major presentation to pick me up and take me home…filling my belly with good food, before returning to her grind. In the aftermath, I lost the contract and all other momentum came to a halt. I got locked away and lost it all, but she still loved me the same.

With proof of that, nothing would prevent me from marrying her and cherishing her. (My mother even chided me: “Boy, you better get your sh*t together so you can marry that girl!” Yes ma’am. lol)

Adam continues, “If I showed you my flaws…if I couldn’t be strong, tell me honestly: would you still love me the same?”

Stereotypically, men are supposed to be tough. We aren’t supposed to have feelings. But we do. So to fit into the stereotypes, we tend to hide our feelings…we tend to hide our flaws. And it yields disastrous results.

Of course, being honest is always best. I try to help brothers understand this and allow themselves to be open to expressing their feelings. But often times it yield disastrous results for men to show their flaws. If men allow themselves to appear weak, they run the risk of losing the one who helps them continue to be strong.

Theron and Timothy ask: “Would you really ride with me? Would you be there to always hold me down? Don’t lie to me: if I didn’t have anything, I wanna know would you stick around?”

Now, the beat is wicked…classic Soca riddim. Will definitely keep you grooving and give you something to whine-up yo waist. But, don’t miss the words, ladies. Because for better or worse, a man wants to know if the woman he’s with would still love him if she knew him…would she still love him if he exposed himself as someone with emotions and flaws. And until he knows that, he will remain distant and unavailable.

So, can you alleviate his fears? Will you still love him the same? If you can, then you will give him space to be available to you…putting his guard down and showing you the love you are looking for.

LeBron James on the Irritants that Strengthen Our Relationships

LeBron Garnett & PierceLast night the Miami Heat defeated the Brooklyn Nets in five games, to head to the Eastern Conference Finals in the NBA. And this morning I saw the clip from the post game interview of LeBron James and Dwayne Wade. Of course, they spoke about the game and the things they did in huge game. But, I was interested in some comments they made when asked about Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce.

Garnett and Pierce have been D. Wade’s and LeBron’s staunch rivals for years. From their days with the Boston Celtics to their time now with the Nets, Garnett and Pierce have been obstacles to LeBron with the Cleveland Cavaliers and both LeBron and Wade with the Miami Heat. Garnett and Pierce have been a force to be reckoned with. In the early years, LeBron just couldn’t beat them. And, eventhough he’s beaten them several times in there NBA playoffs now, they still have been very tough competition.

So when reporters asked LeBron and Wade about their relationship with Garnett and Pierce, I was intrigued by what they had to say. And, in hearing what they said I started thinking about relationships. Here’s a clip of what they said about Kevin Garnett and Paul Pierce:

In my forthcoming relationship book, Championship Love, I use sports and scripture to layout an alternative model for relationships that will end the games that are currently played. So, I had to see what this moment in sports meant for my model. I got to thinking: what do LeBron’s and Wade’s statements about Garnett and Pierce say about how we should act in relationships?

Here’s what they said in brief: their nemeses…their arch rivals…the irritants that presented an obstacle to overcome were the things that made them the team that they are. So here’s where I’m about to go over the deep end.

Can it be that the things that cause you the most difficulty in your relationships are the very things that will shape you and make you great?

I mean: one would think that LeBron and Wade would want to burry Garnett and Pierce. You’d think they wouldn’t want to face those guy because they’re always such difficult competition. But when you are a competitor and you’ve found the right teammate, you want to win by facing the best. The toughest competitors want to face the toughest competition. They almost feel cheated if the make it to the championship by beating a team without their best player.

But in relationships, don’t we look for the easy road to the championship? Don’t we always wish that our opponent’s strongest player is sick? We don’t want to face the enemy’s best! But the enemy at his best, draws out the best in us – if we are a championship caliber team.

So in a sense, we want to face our vices and defeat them. If we’re observant, we notice that the same thing pops up in our relationships over and over. We say: “why do I always have to deal with _______?!” We wish things would get easier. I, myself, wish things weren’t always so difficult. But, what if these obstacles are the very thing that will make us ready for the championship? What if, like LeBron and D. Wade, these obstacles make us mentally tough and ready to compete at the highest levels? Are we running from our blessings?

Are you and your mate a championship caliber team? Do you both possess championship DNA? Or are you a team seeking the easy route to the winner’s circle?

What character issues or social realities are your Garnett and Pierce? Are you looking forward to facing them? Or are you hoping someone else will defeat them so you can have an easier time? I’d love to know your thoughts…

The Value of the Hopeless Romantic

We all know a hopeless romantic. Maybe it’s you…quite possibly it’s me. But, we all know one: that person who tends to fall in love.

Many times our Society criticizes the hopeless romantic. In a culture that is very transient, where we change lovers as often as we change clothes, the hopeless romantic is outside of the norm. The one who believes in love and looks for love is the crazy one. I’m sure: just by reading my words some of you consider me a bit foolish. That’s ok.

Yet, quite possibly the (responsibly) hopeless romantic provides us with the model for that Beloved Community in which Christ calls us to live?

I say the “responsibly” hopeless romantic because there is a danger in naiveté. There is a recklessness in that naiveté that can harm the hopeless romantic, enable relational predators and leave collateral damage in its wake. (There’s so much more to talk about there…don’t you think?)

In my counsel as a relationship coach I help couples embrace the identity of a responsible hopeless romantic. Watch this video for an overview of this theory on the value of the hopeless romantic.

Relationships 103: Wanna Be Loved?

If he would just learn to… If she would just understand… And, so begins the process of coming to love the “one that could be.” Who is the one that could be? Well, that’s the person you believe your significant other could be if only (fill in the blank). If only…if only…if only.

This is another among the lessons I’ve learned from various perspectives through the course of my relationships: you have to be loved and love the one you’re with – as you and they are, now. Not as she or he could be…but as he and she is – right at this moment. It’s kind of like the lesson Richard Gere’s character had to learn in Pretty Woman.

Relationships: Pretty Woman

If we cannot accept a person as they are when we meet them, then the relationship isn’t right. That’s not to say people should not strive for achievement. That certainly is not to say that people should lack ambition. But that is to say that we should be able to accept the other – as he or she is, in this moment.

Many times we come across people who may have many things we like, but there’s that one nagging piece that just doesn’t work for you. He might treat you wonderfully, consider you in everything, and shower you with “Love and Affection” but he just doesn’t earn enough for your preferred lifestyle. But he has potential: he’s smart, ambitious, has a plan. So, you convince yourself that you can endure his present position in life…at least, you try.

She might be smart and sexy, she may have a great career and winning personality, but she doesn’t cook – like at all. Not the: “It’s just me so I don’t bother cooking.” That’s understandable. I’m talking about the: “I don’t cook. I eat out.” Now, cooking really matters to you, so you think twice. But, the sex is good, so you determine you can ignore the absence of any sort of cooking. But even that won’t last.

Your Best Relationships: Can you love the present and not the potential?

We tend to ignore the caution flags. Even red flags are sometimes overlooked. But, if our relationships are to have a fair shot we must be able to accept – to love – the one that is…not the one that could be. Ladies: can you accept him as he is? Gentlemen: can you accept her as she is?

The two examples mentioned above fairly prevalent. Yet, for a well-balanced couple these issues are not important. (More on how that might work in another post, if y’all interested…)

What of more serious matters, such as matters of faith?

What happens when your partner has no expression of faith, or one that doesn’t gel with your expression? This happens easily. Two people come together. The way typical dating goes, couples start off on shallow matters because they are easier to discuss with someone unfamiliar. Lacking strong language for expressing our own faith, we shy away from discussions about our beliefs. Nevertheless, we notice that he or she doesn’t share a similar level of importance for faith in relationships. Despite that, we remain in the relationship hoping that one day faith will be important to their life…and to your shared life. If only…

Of course we should still have ambitions on behalf of our partner. And, love still desires our best interests: so, we should love each other into a more full sense of ourselves. We should love each other in ways that bring out the best in the other. We have to be able to accept a person as they are, if the relationship is to work.

We can grow and learn to be better at certain things. Yet, to build a solid foundation we must come to the job site with the proper tools. If we come to the site with the proper tools, we can learn how to better drive a nail. But if all we have is a spatula, there’s no way we can ever be an effective carpenter.

Beloved, we know very early on whether or not there is something about a potential mate that just is not compatible. Maybe the issue is something that can be resolved. But, if it is something of vital importance to you then it’s not worth forcing yourself to accept what is unacceptable for you.

Moreover, because something is unacceptable for you does not mean that your potential partner is a bad person. It simply might mean that he or she is not the right partner for you. At times, I know it is hard to admit that this otherwise amazing person has a quality that does not fit your makeup. Yet, what financial advisor would lead you to invest in a fund that will most likely fail?

We all want to be loved. And, we should not be loved what what another might think we are or might want us to be. We should be loved for who we are. Only when we are loved for who we are can we become the best of who we could be. When others ignore who we are and only see who they think we could be, they ignore our very real existence. Only by seeing someone as they really are – in the present moment – do we really see that person. Only be seeing someone as they really are do we acknowledge him or her as a person. No wonder the person rarely becomes who we thought they would be!

Do you know who you are? Do you know who your partner is? Do you both understand your personality types, wishes, conceptions, and etc. enough to determine if you can love each other as you are now and as you will be in the future? Find out here!

Buju Banton said it right. So, rather than continue I’ll just let you listen!

Have Your Say

comments

Relationships 101: How Do You Approach “the Box?”

I guess my failures have become so renown, that folk feel comfortable asking me questions on relationships.  They say, “everything happens for a reason.”  And, if my relational failings might serve the common good, to God be the glory!  #MercyLord

Nevertheless, I do give thanks for the opportunity to speak with others about their relationships.  Love and relationships are vital to human existence.  Indeed, the only time in the story of Creation that God proclaimed anything to not be “good” was when man existed without woman (and vice versa, implied).

Yet, as important as relationships are they are quite elusive and confusing.  You don’t need to do much research to prove that statement.  A simple personal reflection will do.  If that’s not sufficient, you can look to those around you: family, friends, coworkers, etc.  Everyone has some story of confusion in relationships.  But to satisfy those who like stats: a simple Google Search for “relationships” yields 527 Million results!

How to Make Relationships Work

Relationships 101: Think Like A Man?That’s the ultimate question, right?  All of the other questions are simply periphery, are the not?  Cosmopolitan-esque questions of “How to Turn on Your Man” and Harvey-esque advice to “think like a man,” don’t seem to really get to the point, do they?  They are necessary: every man wants to be turned on, and women would be helped if they understood men’s way of thinking (and vice versa).  But even after understanding these things, there is more to “getting it right” in relationships.

It’s all in the approach.

One of the fathers told me: “marriage (i.e. relationships) is like a box.”  He went on to explain to me that our consumer society comes to the box of relationships looking for what can be consumed.  We come to the box and take out what’s in it for us.  Man takes…woman takes…and the cycle repeats itself until finally the box is empty.  And, when the box is empty our relationships die.

He went on to say that the proper view of marriage and relationships to to approach the box seeking what we can put into it.  Man gives…woman gives…and the cycle repeats itself until the box is overflowing!  When the box overflows our relationships thrive.

I did two additional Google searches.  First, I searched for “what are you getting out of your relationship.”  This search yielded 772 Million results!  In contrast, a search for “what are you giving to your relationship” yielded a mere 146 Million results.  And even then, many of those results on the first page addressed the more negative aspects of that result pool.

Our natural tendency is to look for what we can get out of the box of relationships.  We come to relationships looking for someone to take care of us…to cook for us…to provide for us…to motivate us…to protect us…to nurture us…to satisfy us…etc, etc, etc.  We are well-intentioned, but those intentions sap the life out of the other.  Even in many relationships that are “lasting,” when husband or wife (or both) are in the “safety” of their friends they are quick to gripe about their spouse!

How do You Approach the Box of Relationships?

It’s quite awkward and counter-cultural, yet when you think of relationships do you consider what you want to give to your partner?  Do you see their failures, their weak-spots, their hurts, their fears and intentionally decide that you want to love them?

I mean love them: not with a simple “I love you” type love, but with that essential and active-type love that rolls up your proverbial sleeves and gets down in the shit of their existence?

Do you approach relationships and become excited by how good you can be to your partner?  Or do you simply consider how good s/he looks and feels to you?  Do you approach the box of relationships thinking of all the wonderful things you possess that you will add to the box?  Or, do you become consumed by thoughts of all the wonderful thing your partner has that you can take from the box?

A Novel Approach to Relationships

I think the wisdom told to me by this father makes a great deal of sense…don’t you?  Yet, it is not an easy approach to make.  For in a society geared towards consumption, most of us approach relationships looking for what we can get out of relationships rather than what we are able to give to them.

As St. Paul said in 2 Corinthians 6:14, we ought not be unequally yoked with unbelievers.  In this respect, we can see the difficulty in taking this approach to relationships when your partner does not share this perspective.

Relationships 101: Overflowing BoxIn theory, we give and we give and we give and we give and we give.  Regardless of who does the giving…no matter if only one gives, eventually the box will still fill to overflowing.  Yet in praxis, a man/woman can only go so long with their giving being unrequited.  If both parties are not giving to the box, the giver will eventually tyre.  Once they have burnt out, they will stop giving and their relationships will ultimately die.

I believe this theory to be the best in securing happy relationships.  Yet, for this theory to work, it is important that both partners be committed to giving to the relationship.  Two takers will kill their relationships faster, but a giver and a taker together will kill their relationships just the same.  So maybe that should be the new “about your mate” question in dating: “How do you approach the box of relationships?”

For more information on approaching the box and to find out how you can change your approach, please see the following video.

 

What do you think?

 

The Wonderful Lessons of Marital Strife

Marriage is tough…and it is tough for a reason – by God’s divine design. Listen and learn of the wonderful lessons of marital strife.

The Scripture readings for this sermon are: Genesis 2:18-24 & Mark 10:2-16.

Tom Cruise: A Lasting Marriage is More than Jumping On Couches

Today, the pop-culture world is abuzz with the announcement of the break up of Tom Cruise’s and Katie Holmes’ marriage.  Much of the focus has been on the role played by Scientology and its “creepy,” “weird” nature (as described by Rupert Murdoch).  However as much as it might comfort us to blame the strange nature of Scientology, there are relationship lessons for those of us who don’t subscribe to that cult.

A lasting marriage is more than jumping on couches.

America paid attention to Tom Cruise’s marriage to Katie Holmes – well, because they are celebrities.  And in the absence of an official monarchy, pop-culture icons become our American Royalty.  So their lives are scrutinized for our enjoyment.  Can they also be examined for our edification?

In May 2005, Tom Cruise jumped onto Oprah Winfrey’s couch to proclaim his love for Katie Holmes.  The video went viral and our love affair, with their love affair, was born.

All along the way, ever since, we’ve been given carefully orchestrated doses of beautiful images of an exquisite love.  We’ve heard glowing statements of undying love and praise.  It was a picture-perfect marriage…a fairy-tale relationship that captured the attention of a nation.

So, today there’s nation-wide heartbreak at the news of Cruise’s and Holmes’ breakup, and we realize that a lasting marriage is more than jumping on couches.  It takes more than photo-ops and verbal professions.

If that’s all it took, then we’d assume that Cruise and Holmes would still be together.  Certainly, there were more than enough “public displays of affection.”  Yet, beyond the public eye, in the real-world that exists for every relationship – behind closed doors, there was discord.

Do we know what the discord was?  It’s been reported…but we can never know for certain.  Moreover, it doesn’t really matter.  What does matter?

If a lasting marriage is more than jumping on couches, what is entailed?

If we look at reports, we’re told that Katie Holmes was “Afraid Tom Would Ship Suri
 To Radical Scientology Org.”  People can focus on the strange details of Scientology’s “Sea Org.”  But, I prefer to look at those common issues that destroy what appears to be the most perfect of loves.

Being individuals, we all have different ideas and varying values.  As a “man of the cloth,” I would say that faith and issues of faith are of primal concern to any relationship’s health.  Disagreements in this arena could be fatal…as Cruise’s and Holmes’ marriage demonstrates.  Worse still, there is a child involved – who had no role in their decision to marry nor in their decision to start a family.

Did Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes discuss how to unite their varying faith perspectives?  Did they create (together) a vision of how that perspective would shape their family?  Did Tom and Katie consider how they would raise their child, prior to conception?

I know this may seem outdated and a bit contrived, but a lasting marriage is more than jumping on couches.  So, it’s smart for us to seriously consider these things and their practical implications.  Romance is great and is a vital part of any thriving relationship.  And, where romance meets practicality (where heart and head converge) is the foundation of a lasting marriage.

What do you think?  Do you think Tom Cruise’s and Katie Holmes’ marriage would have lasted if they were clear on those expectations?  What about you?  In your relationships, do you have these discussions?  Have you and your spouse (or, potential spouse) discussed these matters and come to a shared perspective?  Do you think a shared perspective is necessary?  Post your opinions below.  I’d love to know your thoughts…